Showing posts with label anglican communion. Show all posts
Showing posts with label anglican communion. Show all posts

Thursday, April 8, 2010

The heart of Christianity, Marcus Borg

The Heart of Christianity: Rediscovering a Life of Faith

The heart of Christianity, Marcus Borg,

Some times you will read a Christian book and it just fits with what you need to read. This was one such book for me. One aspect that I wanted to get a bit better grip on was 'liberal' Christinaity, or as Borg would put it 'progressive'. I have for a short while trying to read Bultman and Tilich. But I found them  hard going, to the extent I would just get bogged down in the first couple of pages and just give up. So for the first time I was able to understand what was meant by 'metaphorical' and 'Sacrament'.

For me the book gave important glimps into
: The idea of metaphorical and sacrement
: pluralism of religions
: panthiesm in Christinity
: The different meanings of 'Faith', not necessarily a literal interpretation.
: Salvation and Sin
: The Kingdom of God, mainly in regards to a political social justice and equality.

It is interesting that Borg attends the American equivalent of an Anglican Church. I can now understand how there is such a great divide between the Anglican communion.
I also think that this writing is valuable. Especially for people who come from a evangelical or fundemental background and find a litural understanding as unbelievable. That they find there only option; to throw in Christiantiy all together. This book is truely a way forwards for these people.

I'm looking forward to the getting my hands on his co-authored book with NT Wright, 'The meaning of Jesus'. It will I hope contrast and bring more clarity to evangelical and liberal theology.

Thursday, July 23, 2009

NT Wright's spin on Homosexuality

I've been giving N.T. Wright a bit of a big wrap lately on the blog. Interestingly he has written a piece a few days ago on his position on homosexuality, at the Times online.
"Jesus’s own stern denunciation of sexual immorality would certainly have carried, to his hearers, a clear implied rejection of all sexual behavior outside heterosexual monogamy. This isn’t a matter of “private response to Scripture” but of the uniform teaching of the whole Bible, of Jesus himself, and of the entire Christian tradition. "
A few thoughts, on the whole article
  • loved his description of the issues as 'a slow moving train crash" for the anglicans.
  • This probably isn't an emergent position. I thought that he may have taken a more neutral response.
  • N.T. appears to have a really wanted the anglican community to stick together.